Who Benefits From Science?

Advancing science and technology without regard to outcomes—as a new $100 billion technology bill introduced in Congress proposes to do—is relatively straightforward. Advancing science and technology in a way that helps to address the knowledge and innovation needs of the nation is much more difficult. But that’s the sort of challenge that today’s civil and political unrest (and the legacy of neglect on which they build) indicate should be at the center of how policy-makers organize public investments in science and technology.

Editor's Journal

  • The Science Policy We Deserve

    Science policy centers have come and gone over the past few decades, all aimed at providing analysis that can support decision-making about a variety of issues in science and technology. But such centers are expendable: no one really cares about science policy analysis unless it provides more reasons for getting more money into the research system.

    Read More

Forum

Perspectives

Features

  • The Race to the Top

    Why is it that neoclassical economists have failed to see the impact that foreign competition has had on the economic growth of the United States and the United Kingdom? I think the answer is that at the center of neoclassical economic growth theory is still the assumption that the market economy is one of perfect competition.

    Read More
  • Save America’s Dying Cities

    The nation has actively pursued “urban renewal” and “slum clearance” since the Great Depression, and “innovation hubs” and “tech corridors” more recently, yet not one consciously devised revitalization solution has stemmed decay in any significant way.

    Read More
  • Public Value Science

    In an economic environment characterized by growth but also by extreme inequality, science and technology not only reinforce inequality but also, in some instances, help widen the gap. Science and technology can be a regressive factor in the economy.

    Read More
  • Can Automated Vehicles Prove Themselves to Be Safe?

    With more than 40 companies racing to put automated vehicles on the road, why does commercial availability seem always just over the horizon? Safety is among the most compelling arguments for automated vehicles, and yet safety remains a major hurdle for their development.

    Read More
  • The Great Fish Pain Debate

    Do fish feel pain? For over 50 years, this question has been the focus of multiple scientific careers and consumed countless hours of research, debate, and reflection. But a different and related question has received far less attention: how and why did fish pain come to be a contentious scientific question in the first place?

    Read More
  • Whose Drugs Are These?

    Radar, penicillin, the atomic bomb—these technologies helped win World War II, in large part because the US government supported their development. Today, the nation faces a new enemy in COVID-19, and fresh questions about how government support can help develop drugs and vaccines as quickly, effectively, and affordably as possible.

    Read More

Book Reviews

  • TRANSHUMANISM, NATURE, AND THE ENDS OF SCIENCE by Robert Frodeman

    A Scathing but Empty Critique

    What transhumanists envision is not reordering nature, but a far more expansive program entailing nature’s radical reconstruction or even abolition. Constructed or virtual reality should supplant an indifferent nature as the principal context in which humans live and have their being.

    Read More
  • CAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY SAVE CHINA? edited by Susan Greenhalgh and Li Zhang

    China as Mirror

    It has become common for Americans to demonize China as a dragon of economic and viral infections that needs to be taught a lesson. The contemporary American love-hate relationship with China is thrown into new relief when it comes to science and technology.

    Read More
  • DATA FEMINISM by Catherine D’Ignazio and Lauren F. Klein

    Doing the Work

    When it comes to reform, Data Feminism underscores something those of us doing the work know to be true: the policy-making process is inherently messy, but the best way to make it more manageable and equitable is to ensure the broadest possible participation in the formulation of the problem, as well as the implementation of the solution.

    Read More
  • THE TRIUMPH OF DOUBT by David Michaels

    Complicating the Narrative

    We should stop trying to convince people that good science can somehow enshrine a policy with “objectivity” or “validity.” We should instead remind people that that the role of the discerning citizen requires critical reasoning across a wide range of considerations, perspectives, value judgments, and disciplines.

    Read More
Explore more Issues