Marilou Schultz, "Replica of a Chip," 1994, wool, 47 x 57 inches. Collection of the American Indian Science and Engineering Society.

The Tradeoffs Universities Face in Chasing the R1 Designation

November 21, 2025

The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education was meant to be a description of universities’ characteristics that could help researchers and policymakers evaluate the higher ed landscape as a whole. In other words, the Research I, or R1, category, which indicates high research spending and significant doctoral production, was never supposed to be an “elite” level toward which non-R1 institutions should strive.

Whatever the original intent, “the R1 research designation has become a powerful symbol of prestige,” writes Erin Lynch in Issues. “Like a bright light at the end of an expensive tunnel, the designation has come to represent the possibility of greater research cost recovery and purchasing power.”

For schools that suffer a legacy of underinvestment, such as historically Black colleges and universities, Lynch argues that chasing the R1 designation may come at a significant cost to their access-oriented missions. “This is a difficult path for most institutions,” she writes, “but for HBCUs with a historical disadvantage, stony is the road.”

Related Article

Stony the Road We Trod: The Tradeoffs Universities Face in Chasing the R1 Designation